Saturday, October 16, 2010

Not another balloon photo

Yeah, more balloons. Mostly I don't take much notice but there was a bit of a problem with these two. The first landed on a field very close to the playground where we take Little Jo. Usually they land much further into the park in a more open area. The second one clearly intended to land there but hovered stationary for a time. How can it remain stationary? I don't know.

It then rose and drifted off again and landed further into the park. Landings seem to be seldom text book and very variable but I don't know of any serious mishaps in Melbourne. I recall one landing on the island in Albert Park Lake and the occupants had to be 'rescued'. Here is a link to our balloon flight a couple of years ago.


  1. I am mildly surprised that these are sanctioned over the city, but then again, this is Melbourne.

    Do you have a hot air tax?

  2. If they taxed hot air then our State pollies would be bankrupt :P

  3. ditto

    Geez if I hear one more thing about 'that bloody religious woman' I will simply have to puke!

    Have to play records today ... ggrrr ...

  4. That's what I don't trust about these balloons, they just go where ever the breeze takes them.
    One landed on the other side of the highway last week, in a park. I didn't know they came this far out.

  5. Julie, the airport is a long way out, unlike K-S and the balloons generally fly south west or north east, the prevailing wind directions. We ought to have a hot air from mouth tax.

    The would for sure Jayne.

    Records Julie, how quaint. You'll get your exercise winding the player up. Sick of 'that woman' news too, not that I have any issue with her.

    I don't know how they do it Fen, but they seem to have very good control of them.


Before you change something, find out why it is the way it is in the first place - unknown.