Saturday, September 08, 2007

Turn back the PT clock

It is so bleeding obvious, it smacks you in the face.

Public Transport Users Association Secretary Anthony Morton had an excellent letter published in today's Age. I agree with his view in spite of the danger of retrospective rose coloured glasses. Our trains could carry over two hundred million passengers a year in 1951 but can't cope with one hundred and eighty million now.

The only qualification I would make is that I remember the frequent and long waits in the railyards for a Flinders Street platform became available. The opening of the City Loop reduced the waiting, but then my memory of our trains doesn't go back further than the seventies, so I would guess it was a lot better in the fifties.

Here is the text.

AS THE annual patronage on Melbourne's trains climbs through 180 million, it may only be a year or two before we reach the record of 201 million set in 1951. And yet our Government seems to be approaching this milestone not so much with delight as with fear and trepidation (The Age, 7/9). How can it be that our train system carried so many people into the city 50 years ago, with red rattlers, no City Loop and only six platforms at Richmond instead of 10, and yet struggles so much now? Sure, there were more people travelling off-peak then, but this can be only part of the answer.

In fact, there are two crucial things our public transport system had in the first half of the 20th century that are missing today. One is the planning and management know-how to sustain reliable operations with high and growing passenger volumes. The other is an overriding concern for passenger service, as opposed to bureaucratic convenience or cost-cutting. These qualities do still exist today, but only in cities beyond Melbourne that have not offloaded their planning responsibilities to private operators. It is time we invited some of these planners to sort out our public transport mess, as it is clear neither Connex nor our defeatist bureaucracy have a clue.
Tony Morton, Secretary, Public Transport Users Association, Melbourne


  1. PT suxx anywhere.


  2. What's happened since 1951?

    Rise of private transport, namely the automobile. Given that the car industry (involving everything from production, fuel, insurance, repairs, fines, etc) generates massive amounts of jobs and tax, it is highly unlikely that any government would even consider any great leap towards PT. Considering all of the issues regarding PT, my conspiracy tells me that the sad state that it's in is a very much deliberate action.

  3. You have your own issues in Sydney Keshi, which I also follow.

    There are many and varied reasons Rob. Safe operation has slowed things down. Less entry/exit doors would not help. The loss of experience and engineering is significant.